![]() |
The review process |
|
The OTHER HALF of
workshopping
Reviewing Stories, Poems or Novel Chapters Many new members feel uncomfortable reviewing at first. If you haven't written critiques before, this page contains some ideas, member comments, and steps to help you get started. Let's start with some ideas from experienced Scrawl members:
The purpose of a review (also called a critique, crit, or comments) is to give the writer useful feedback to help improve his/her work. This means a broad range of comments can be useful: reader's observations and feelings, comments about plot, construction, mechanics, subject, clarity or anything else that comes to mind while reading. Each posted story or poem will be receiving more than one critique, so don't feel you have to provide the last word in analysis of the piece. The writers will sift through the feedback and take what they find useful.
Scrawl does not have a minimum length for reviews, nor do we use rating scale. Members develop their own reviewing styles, and review length and content will be different for different works. Also, as you get to know the other members, you'll learn that writers are looking for different kinds of feedback. The best way to learn about reviewing is to read others' reviews in the workshops.
Before you get started on your own comments on other writer's work, read some reviews. The workshops are the place to get started; read some stories and the responding critiques. They'll give you some ideas for how to write your own reviews.
I generally consider a story successful if it presents a character
overcoming a challenge. Most of the time I'm concerned with: Steve Frederick Then, read the piece you are going to review carefully. Some reviewers print a copy and make notes on paper. Others read it on the screen, but go through it several times.
BEFORE I write a critique, I read the story twice. It's easy to miss Make your critique as specific as you can. Use clips from the story to illustrate your point. Don’t reproduce the whole story, but cut and paste portions as needed.
The most useful critiques have almost always been the tough ones, the picky ones, the ones that drove me nuts as an author. The complimentary ones are nice to get, but all they do is make me complacent, instead of making me challenge myself. Carolyn AgostaKeep the comments about the work , not the individual. Reviews should try to answer the question, "What's good, or not, about this piece?" not "Am I a good writer?" If you are familiar with the writer's body of work, it's fine to compare things, or note growth. But in general, try to keep the review focused on the workshopped piece.
Offer something positive with your criticism. Reviews don't have to be about praise, but the writers here are all human. Even if you don't like the story, it probably had a paragraph or an image or something in it that you did like, and if so, mention it. If you liked everything about the story, say so, but be sure to include anything you think might improve it.
Reviewing gets easier as you do more of it, and you'll learn from the reviews of your own work, too. Workshopping is the heart of the site, and your thoughtful reviews will be appreciated - and probably returned! Return to the Scrawl Home Page.
|